CDN edge delivery with per-chunk cryptographic audit proof — EU AI Act-ready across jurisdictions.
Adaptive CDN delivery with a per-chunk Byzantine audit trail.
CDNs route chunks to edge nodes blind — no insight into whether delivery was tampered, replayed, or arrived out of order. A player in Jakarta getting a corrupted game patch cannot prove which node failed. Neither can the distributor.
Hydra-CDN seals every chunk with TTTPS — a cryptographic proof of delivery time and integrity, anchored to a verified timestamp chain. Tampering, replay, and reordering are caught in real time and logged to a tamper-evident trail.
GapVec5 picks the optimal edge path in real time across 5 dimensions: ISP density, latency, packet loss, throughput, DPI fingerprint. It re-routes continuously as conditions change. No manual configuration.
Lattice coding reconstructs missing chunks from redundant blocks across peer nodes without retransmission, even under 30% packet loss (hardware validation pending). The client never sees the drop.
No CDN changes. Hydra-CDN layers on top of existing delivery infrastructure as a sidecar audit and routing layer.
| Capability | Detail |
|---|---|
| Routing | GapVec5 real-time ISP/edge path selection |
| Integrity | TTTPS chunk seal — per-chunk tamper-evident audit |
| Resilience | Adaptive lattice-coded redundancy (tunable shard ratio for high-loss links): high theoretical recovery under packet loss (lattice-coding bound; hardware validation pending) |
| Targeting | ISP density · latency · DPI fingerprint-aware |
| Peering | Fabric EVPL ready |
| P2P | Lattice recovery across peer nodes |
Every content chunk generates a TTTPS seal — cryptographically binding delivery to a verifiable timestamp and commitment chain.
Audit trail per chunk:
{
"chunk_hash": "sha256:a3f9c2...",
"ctx_id": "cdn-pool-sg1",
"timestamp_ms": 1748000000000,
"attack_type": null,
"signature": "ed25519:..."
}
Queryable by audit organizations:
curl "https://api.kenosian.com/audit?ctx_id=cdn-pool-sg1&window=86400" \ -H "X-API-Key: <your-key>"
Any chunk delivery is forensically traceable — who received it, when, in what order, and whether its content matches the original commitment. Post-incident investigation stops being guesswork and becomes a deterministic query against a structured log.
| Attack Type | Description | Detection Method |
|---|---|---|
| REPLAY | Same chunk delivered twice to the same node | ctx_id + timestamp window deduplication |
| ORDERING | Chunks arrived out of sequence | Monotonic sequence counter per stream |
| FORGE | Chunk content tampered in transit | SHA-256 commitment mismatch vs. TTTPS seal |
| FLOOD | Delivery rate abuse — chunk storm to single node | Rate envelope check per ctx_id window |
Audit log retention: 90 days for production accounts · 1 hour for demo endpoints.
Try the TTTPS audit endpoint — no install required.
curl -X POST https://api.kenosian.com/pot/generate \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"event_id":"cdn-demo","payload":"chunk-seal-test"}'
Expected response (schema — live values depend on server state):
{
"status": "ok",
"ctx_id": "cdn-demo",
"timestamp_ms": 1748000000000,
"lattice_commitment": "a3f9c2...",
"chain_digest": "b7c2e1...",
"signature": "ed25519-base64...",
"pubkey": "acac8eae..."
}
Replay attack detection — submit same token twice:
# Second submission triggers REPLAY detection
curl -X POST https://api.kenosian.com/api/demo/pot/verify \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"ctx_id":"cdn-demo","token":"<paste-token>"}'
# → {"valid":false,"attack_type":"REPLAY"}
Run CDN delivery and TTTPS audit together and the whole delivery stack becomes accountable. Each chunk is sealed with a TTTPS temporal token before it leaves the origin — by the time it reaches an edge node, the seal has already committed its hash, delivery timestamp, and source identity to a tamper-evident chain.
Per chunk, the audit log captures: chunk_hash (SHA-256 of content), delivery node (edge node ID and region), timestamp (Roughtime-anchored, ±ms precision), and attack_type (null if clean, else REPLAY / ORDERING / FORGE / FLOOD).
For game and content distributors, that is a regulator-grade delivery record: prove to a content owner or auditor exactly when a chunk was delivered, to which node, and that it was untampered — without trusting the edge provider's own metrics.
cdn-pool-sg1) delivered a chunk with a mismatched hash — pinpointing the failure to a specific node, timestamp, and content block without any guesswork.
TRAI/CERT-In compliance: the audit log format is JSON-LD exportable for regulatory submission. Audit queries return structured records compatible with India's CERT-In cybersecurity reporting framework and TRAI's Quality of Service monitoring requirements.
| Metric | Akamai (current) | Hydra-CDN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost per patch | $1.57M (est. 2GB × 16M users · Akamai public-range pricing) | $6.3K |
| Delivery time | 130 min (illustrative — large-scale game patch sequential delivery estimate; not Akamai-measured) | 6 min |
| India DAU | BGMI 16M DAU — India 590M gamers (industry est.) | |
| JioCDN limitation | Jio-only (AS55836) — Airtel (AS9498) excluded. Hydra-CDN covers all ISPs via GapVec5. | |
| CGNAT traversal | Not handled | QUIC hole-punch 30% + STUN 50% + TURN 20% = 95%+ coverage |
Illustrative target workload profiles on colocation fabric — pre-engagement (LOI stage). Not current customers. No contracts executed. IBX codes: MB1/MB2/MB3/MB4 = Mumbai, CN1 = Chennai (opened Sep 2025), SG1/SG2/SG3 = Singapore, HK1/HK2 = Hong Kong, TY3/TY11 = Tokyo, LD4/LD5/LD6 = London, FR5/FR7 = Frankfurt, DC2/DC6/DC10 = Ashburn/VA, LA1/LA3 = Los Angeles, SP4 = São Paulo, SY1/SY3/SY4 = Sydney. Revenue figures are projected potential, not contractual.
| Gaming workloads (illustrative) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Target Client (Illustrative Workload) | IBX | Use Case | Value (projected) |
| Krafton / BGMI 16M DAU India (industry est.) · AS path via MB1/MB2 | MB1 · MB2 (Mumbai) + CN1 (Chennai, target) | Game patch delivery — per-chunk TTTPS audit; CGNAT traversal across Jio/Airtel/BSNL; MB1/MB2 campus for West India + CN1 for South India/Tamil Nadu reach (CN1 interconnected to MB campus via dark fiber) | ~$6.3K/patch vs $1.57M Akamai (projected, same 2GB × 16M DAU basis) |
| JioGames / JioCinema OTT · India 590M gamer base · Jio AS55836 | MB1 · MB2 (Mumbai) + CN1 (Chennai, target) | OTT streaming integrity — TTTPS-sealed chunk delivery; TRAI/CERT-In audit log for regulatory submission; MB1 hosts AMS-IX India / Bharat IX / DE-CIX India peering; CN1 near submarine cable landing sites (Siruseri, TN) for South India last-mile | Projected audit cost reduction vs manual CERT-In reporting (pre-engagement) |
| SEA Game Publisher e.g. Garena / Sea Group · SEA multi-ISP | SG1 (Singapore) | Low-latency patch delivery across SEA ISPs; replay/forge attack detection per-chunk; regulator-grade delivery record | Projected compliance overhead reduction for MAS TRM reporting (illustrative) |
| NetEase / HK-based Publisher HK / TW / JP distribution | HK1 (Hong Kong) · TY3 (Tokyo) | Cross-border chunk delivery with cryptographic proof chain; audit export for jurisdiction-specific regulatory filing | Pre-engagement — LOI stage |
| Media / OTT / Streaming workloads (illustrative) | |||
| Regional OTT Platform Netflix-class workload · EU & UK distribution | LD5 (London) · FR5 (Frankfurt) | VOD chunk delivery with per-segment TTTPS seal; NIS2 Art.21 availability audit trail; tamper-evident delivery log for regulator submission — designed for platforms operating at Netflix-class scale (Netflix uses its own Open Connect; this is an illustrative workload profile) | Projected compliance overhead reduction vs manual NIS2 reporting (illustrative) |
| Live-Streaming / Sports Broadcast Low-latency live video · US East Coast | DC6 (Ashburn/VA) | Live video segment delivery — sub-second chunk audit; replay/reorder attack detection in real time; cryptographic delivery proof for rights-holder audit; designed for live sports and event streaming workloads at scale | Pre-engagement — LOI stage (projected) |
| Pacific Rim VOD Platform YouTube-class workload · APAC multi-region | SG2 (Singapore) · SY3 (Sydney) · TY11 (Tokyo) | Multi-region VOD delivery with per-chunk cryptographic proof chain; PDPA (SG/TH) and Australian ACMA audit log; designed for platforms serving APAC at YouTube-class volume (YouTube uses Google's own CDN; this is an illustrative workload profile) | Projected audit trail value vs manual ACMA/PDPA reporting (illustrative) |
| LatAm OTT / Streaming Regional OTT · Brazil & LatAm | SP4 (São Paulo) | VOD and live-event chunk delivery across LatAm ISPs; tamper-evident per-chunk delivery log; designed for platforms operating under Brazilian LGPD and regional content delivery mandates | Pre-engagement — LOI stage (projected) |
| Entertainment CDN Disney+-class workload · US West Coast | LA1 (Los Angeles) | High-volume VOD and live streaming delivery; per-chunk TTTPS seal for content-owner forensic audit; CGNAT traversal for residential ISP coverage; designed for major entertainment streaming workloads (Disney+ operates its own CDN; this is an illustrative workload profile) | Projected cost reduction vs Akamai/CloudFront at comparable egress volume (illustrative) |
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| ISP peering | Jio (AS55836), Airtel (AS9498), BSNL (AS9829), Tata (AS6453) |
| Latency probing | GapVec5 probes SE2/MA1/FR5/LD5 in real-time |
| Connectivity | EVPL connection: 1GbE–400GbE |
| GEO Pre-Burst (roadmap) | Planned satellite pre-seeding via KTSat (MA1 target — not yet deployed) |
HYDRA-CDN's lattice coding and per-chunk TTTPS audit seal are designed to satisfy availability and integrity requirements for network service providers.
| Regulation | Requirement | HYDRA-CDN Coverage |
|---|---|---|
| NIS2 Art.21 EU 2022/2555 | Business continuity, availability for essential entities | Lattice coding designed to tolerate 30% packet loss (hardware validation pending); GapVec5 adaptive routing for resilient delivery |
| TRAI India | Content delivery integrity and availability | Per-chunk TTTPS audit seal; delivery forensics queryable by content owners |
| CERT-In India | Incident reporting with forensic evidence | Tamper-evident delivery log; cryptographic chunk verification |
| ACMA Broadcasting Services Act Australia | Content delivery integrity, availability assurance | Per-chunk TTTPS seal provides verifiable delivery record for ACMA audit submissions |
| APRA CPS 234 Australia Prudential Regulation Authority | Information security for regulated entities delivering digital services | Cryptographic delivery log designed to satisfy CPS 234 information asset integrity requirements |
| MAS TRM 2021 + AIRG 2025 Singapore + AI Risk Mgmt Guidelines | Technology risk management — CDN and third-party delivery integrity | Byzantine-audited delivery chain with Roughtime-anchored timestamps (±ms precision); queryable per-chunk |
| PDPA Thailand / Singapore | Personal data protection, cross-border transfer integrity | Chunk-level audit trail confirms data handling chain; TTTPS seal as transfer proof |
| EU AI Act Art.11 Technical Documentation | Providers of high-risk AI must maintain technical documentation | Per-chunk TTTPS audit trail provides tamper-evident technical documentation of every CDN delivery operation |
| EU AI Act Art.15 Accuracy & Cybersecurity | High-risk AI systems must meet accuracy and cybersecurity requirements | 7 Byzantine attack vectors covered in design (6 roadmap); lattice coding designed to tolerate 30% packet loss (hardware validation pending) |
| EU AI Act Art.19 Automatically Generated Logs | High-risk AI systems must automatically generate operational logs | Every chunk delivery automatically logged with TTTPS seal — zero manual configuration |
| EU AI Act Art.72 Post-Market Monitoring | Providers must establish post-market monitoring of AI system behavior | Continuous Byzantine audit stream enables post-deployment CDN behavior monitoring — REPLAY/FORGE/ORDERING events logged with cryptographic evidence. 🔜 Roadmap: Upon DPU deployment — full Art.72 instrumentation |
| Tier | Price | Includes | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | $0.005/GB delivered | QUIC delivery · adaptive lattice coding · TTTPS per-chunk seal · GapVec5 ISP routing · Audit 30-day trial | Contact |
| Compliance | $0.006/GB delivered | All Standard + TTTPS seal explicitly billed (regulatory submission ready) | Contact |
| Institutional | €12,000/month | Fabric VLAN · high-volume delivery (fair-use cap) · TTTPS compliance seal · Custom SLA · co-location support |
Cloudflare: $0.015/GB (Cloudflare Stream / R2 egress; Cloudflare CDN Orange Cloud egress is free-tier — check product for applicable rate) · AWS CloudFront: $0.0085/GB · Hydra-CDN: $0.005/GB + compliance seal.
Annual contract: 2 months free.
Contact peter@kenosian.com for API key provisioning and integration support.
EU AI Act Art.12 requires high-risk AI systems to log every operation — including content delivery. Every content chunk delivered through Hydra-CDN is designed to carry a TTTPS-sealed cryptographic proof: which content, which node, at what time, unforgeable. The CoE AI Convention (in force since 2025-11-01) provides a common framework — one cryptographic proof chain designed to support submission across signatory jurisdictions. High-risk AI obligations under Art.12: 2026-08-02 (current law) → deferred to 2027-12-02 under EU Digital Omnibus provisional agreement (pending formal adoption).
“Third-party evaluation could be done by a government agency (similar to the FAA) or a set of private organizations that are authorized and inspected by the government.”
Each chunk delivered at the edge can be sealed with a verifiable, tamper-rejecting record of when it was served — timing-integrity evidence for availability and delivery disputes. If TTTPS is adopted as the standard, a delivery deployment could carry the “TTTPS-certified” mark, signalling that its per-chunk delivery record is anchored to verifiable time.
Proposed mark for explanation only. Any “certified” status is conditional (“could / if adopted”) and would operate under the Kenosian root of trust — not a present-day certification program.